7/10/2023 0 Comments Cloudfogger vs boxcryptor![]() Conversely, by developing better security habits for ourselves, we may improve our ability to protect the information of our patrons in our digital environment.Īs librarians, we draw great benefit from collaborative efforts. To be sure, we understand the difference between putting our own information at risk and that of our patrons, but an argument can be made that our relaxed attitudes towards our own information security may leave us less prepared when it comes to protecting the information of our patrons. In doing so, we prioritize the benefits we receive from these services over knowledge and/or control of the security protecting the information we put therein. In both cases, we allow ourselves to be fully reliant on policies and measures put in place by others, often without sufficient understanding of the measures used to adequately evaluate their efficacy. We use tools like Twitter, AnyMeeting, Evernote, Trello, Google Docs, and others to seamlessly communicate, coordinate, and create across great geographical distances. Meanwhile, at work, librarians seek opportunities to collaborate, and there are a plethora of free tools available to us for that purpose. In our personal lives, we conduct financial transactions, log our searches, map our comings and goings, and share the details of our day-to-day lives, exposing a trove of private information to the world without much consideration as to how it may or may not be protected. As our interactions through technology have increased, so has our acceptance of risk as it pertains to privacy. On top of this, other more subtle issues may stand in the way of our efforts at information security. Managing collaborative environments can be difficult in its own right, and most privacy technology is developed for use by individuals. Keeping this information secure can be a challenge, particularly when it must be shared. In addition to protecting patron information, libraries must maintain other forms of sensitive information – account numbers, server passwords, etc. However, whereas information security in 1939 consisted mainly of locking paper records in a file cabinet, the challenges in today’s digital world are far different. Information security has been a concern of libraries for over 75 years, particularly in terms of patron privacy, as evidenced in the very first Code of Ethics adopted by the American Library Association in 1939: “It is the librarian’s obligation to treat as confidential any private information obtained through contact with library patrons” (ALA 1939). Whichever solution you choose in the end: Please do not compromise on the security of your data.Privacy is a fundamental aspect of libraries. Boxcryptor takes care of data protection in the background. On-the-fly encryption allows you to work as usual in a familiar environment. The advantage of Boxcryptor is that the functionality of your preferred cloud storage services is not impaired.Not only does it do what it does well, it also integrates with plenty of /5. Boxcryptor is one of the best pieces of encryption software on the market today.Tojajora 22 September 2020: deped order 21 series 2012 It’s also worth nothing that adding encryption to your data to the cloud decreases the user experience quite dramatically. I might prefer BoxCryptor a bit more over the other two because it supports a wider range of platforms I encounter on daily basis. Boxcryptor is available for free to encrypt one cloud on two devices, or as a one-year-license for as many clouds and devices as you like, for personal or business use. For comparison, look at the following example of the encryption process in Cloudfogger: ©maketecheasier. Visually, the difference between Cloudfogger and Boxcryptor is minimal.CloudFogger adds an entry in right-click context menu to make this easy. ![]() One feature of CloudFogger that is different than both BoxCryptor and CryptSync is the fact that it can be used as a traditional file encryption tool: you can use CloudFogger to encrypt individual files (non-cloud storage files), just like what AxCrypt does.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |